Oct 04, 2010, 07:54 AM // 07:54
|
#1
|
Ascalonian Squire
Join Date: Sep 2010
Profession: N/Mo
|
Srs bsns question:
Why do people want r9 items?
|
|
|
Oct 04, 2010, 10:54 AM // 10:54
|
#2
|
WTB q8 15^50 Weapons!
Join Date: Nov 2006
Guild: アoo アugs アlan [ァアァ]
|
cus it looks better. more intresting is why ppl want r7-8, cus theyre rare. in 95% of situations req doesnt matter, in some Pvp builds it does tho
|
|
|
Oct 04, 2010, 11:41 AM // 11:41
|
#3
|
Ascalonian Squire
Join Date: Sep 2010
Profession: N/Mo
|
thank you.
just started returning to guild wars
|
|
|
Oct 09, 2010, 09:35 AM // 09:35
|
#4
|
...is in denial
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Hyperion
Guild: starcraft 2
Profession: P/Me
|
so they don't have to spec 10+ in the attribute or because they think its cool
|
|
|
Oct 09, 2010, 12:59 PM // 12:59
|
#5
|
Site Legend
|
Sell low req, keep and customize high req.
__________________
Old Skool '05
|
|
|
Oct 09, 2010, 02:19 PM // 14:19
|
#6
|
Grotto Attendant
Join Date: Aug 2008
Guild: "アoo アugs アlan [ァアァ]" | Retired in "Teh Academy [PhD]"
Profession: Mo/A
|
merch high req, keep and customize low req. ;-)
depends on what u personally prefer...
if u want money sell low req keep high req,
if u want nice weapons and dont care about money... keep nice low reqs and sell high req.
cheers
|
|
|
Oct 09, 2010, 09:10 PM // 21:10
|
#7
|
Desert Nomad
Join Date: Jan 2009
Profession: N/
|
allow me to expand on dr love's response. This goes to the OP, those of us who know the ropes will just think 'duh!'
Lets say you have 2 max damage swords, one requires 9 swordsmanship (r9), the other requires 12 swordsmanship (r12). The r9 requires I invest 48 of the total 200 attribute points in order to take full advantage of that sword. The r12 requires 97 attribute points. So with the r9, I still have 152 attribute points I can spread into other attributes (Strength, Tactics, or attributes of your secondary profession), where as with the r12, I only have 103 attribute points left.
So that's why low req weapons are better.
|
|
|
Oct 09, 2010, 11:15 PM // 23:15
|
#8
|
Grotto Attendant
Join Date: May 2005
Location: in the midline
Profession: E/Mo
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Black Metal
allow me to expand on dr love's response. This goes to the OP, those of us who know the ropes will just think 'duh!'
Lets say you have 2 max damage swords, one requires 9 swordsmanship (r9), the other requires 12 swordsmanship (r12). The r9 requires I invest 48 of the total 200 attribute points in order to take full advantage of that sword. The r12 requires 97 attribute points. So with the r9, I still have 152 attribute points I can spread into other attributes (Strength, Tactics, or attributes of your secondary profession), where as with the r12, I only have 103 attribute points left.
So that's why low req weapons are better.
|
Most people never invest lower than 12 attribute in their weapon. The exception is paragons and rangers, who need Command/Wilderness Survival. You need Rank 12 in your weapon to do 100% of listed damage regardless. You can test this with Keen chop / wild blow.
Why Req9? Because that's what PvP weapons are. And if you run 12+1+1/10+1/8+1 or 11+1+1/11+1/8+1 then 9 is the breakpoint (12+1+1/11+1/6+1 so 7 is the other).
Low req really only applies to shields. You don't want low req weapons unless it is for rarity/vanity (and maybe divine favor/soul reaping/fast casting etc. wands and staves since they always do 100% listed damage as long as req is met).
The caveat here is weakness. If weakness is applied and you don't have 1 more than the attribute, focii will lose +6 energy. Staves don't have this problem. Weakness on weapons doesn't matter since you're going to be doing 66% less damage regardless.
Last edited by LifeInfusion; Oct 09, 2010 at 11:22 PM // 23:22..
|
|
|
Thread Tools |
|
Display Modes |
Linear Mode
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
All times are GMT. The time now is 07:29 PM // 19:29.
|